Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, has called on the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to retain what he described as “operational freedom” in Gaza, warning against any international or domestic constraints that could limit military activities in the Palestinian enclave. His comments come amid growing debates over the scope of Israel’s military operations and the political negotiations surrounding security arrangements in the region.
Speaking at a political gathering in Jerusalem, Ben-Gvir stressed that Israel’s security cannot be compromised by external pressures or diplomatic considerations. According to him, the IDF must remain free to respond to security threats “without hesitation or restrictions” to safeguard Israeli citizens. He argued that any attempt to limit Israel’s military maneuverability would embolden militant groups and weaken deterrence.
The minister’s remarks are seen as a response to ongoing talks involving international stakeholders and humanitarian organizations, many of whom have raised concerns about the humanitarian toll of Israeli operations in Gaza. Calls for greater restraint and adherence to international law have intensified, particularly as civilian casualties and infrastructure damage remain central issues in the conflict.
Ben-Gvir, known for his hardline stance on security and territorial issues, insisted that Israel has both the right and obligation to act decisively in the face of attacks from Gaza-based militants. He added that the IDF must not be subjected to what he termed “political handcuffs,” emphasizing that military commanders should be given full autonomy in decision-making during operations.
His statement has sparked sharp criticism from opposition lawmakers and human rights advocates, who argue that unrestrained military action risks escalating the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. Critics also warn that Israel’s international standing could be further strained if calls for accountability are ignored.
Meanwhile, regional observers say the minister’s position reflects growing divisions within Israel’s political class over how to balance security concerns with diplomatic efforts to ease tensions. While some Israeli leaders have expressed openness to coordinated frameworks with international partners, hardliners insist that only unilateral military strength can ensure lasting security.
As the conflict continues to generate both local and global attention, Ben-Gvir’s remarks underscore the deepening debate within Israel over the future of its military policy in Gaza, with implications for peace negotiations, regional stability, and the humanitarian crisis affecting millions of Palestinians.
