The U.S. Congress is preparing to debate President Donald Trump’s authority to wage war against Iran, a move that comes under unusual circumstances: the country is already engaged in military strikes.
Lawmakers from both parties have raised concerns that Trump ordered attacks without congressional approval, igniting a fresh clash over war powers. Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, and Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky have introduced a resolution to require authorization before further military action. “He can’t without Congress,” Khanna said, pledging to force a vote in the House.
The debate reflects growing unease in Washington after U.S. strikes, carried out with Israel, killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and several senior officials. Critics warn the campaign risks drawing America into a prolonged Middle East conflict without a clear endgame.
Supporters of Trump’s approach argue the strikes demonstrate U.S. resolve and could weaken Iran’s regional influence. They say the president acted within his constitutional powers as commander in chief, pointing to the urgency of countering Tehran’s threats.
Opponents counter that bypassing Congress undermines democratic oversight and could set a dangerous precedent. “This is potentially an illegal campaign,” one lawmaker said, urging a swift vote to restrain the administration.
International observers note that the debate in Washington is unfolding as the conflict intensifies on the ground. Analysts warn that escalation could destabilize the region and disrupt global energy markets, underscoring the stakes of Congress’s decision.
